Graduating Seniors! Keep your Public Library account past July 2018 and get a new Library Card delivered to your home. Go to My Account > Account Settings and update your contact information and holds pickup branch.

A matter of interpretation: federal courts and the law : an essay

Book Cover
Average Rating
Publisher:
Princeton University Press,
Pub. Date:
c1997.
Language:
English
Description

We are all familiar with the image of the immensely clever judge who discerns the best rule of common law for the case at hand. According to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, a judge like this can maneuver through earlier cases to achieve the desired aim--"distinguishing one prior case on his left, straight-arming another one on his right, high-stepping away from another precedent about to tackle him from the rear, until (bravo!) he reaches the goal--good law." But is this common-law mindset, which is appropriate in its place, suitable also in statutory and constitutional interpretation? In a witty and trenchant essay, Justice Scalia answers this question with a resounding negative.

In exploring the neglected art of statutory interpretation, Scalia urges that judges resist the temptation to use legislative intention and legislative history. In his view, it is incompatible with democratic government to allow the meaning of a statute to be determined by what the judges think the lawgivers meant rather than by what the legislature actually promulgated. Eschewing the judicial lawmaking that is the essence of common law, judges should interpret statutes and regulations by focusing on the text itself. Scalia then extends this principle to constitutional law. He proposes that we abandon the notion of an everchanging Constitution and pay attention to the Constitution's original meaning. Although not subscribing to the "strict constructionism" that would prevent applying the Constitution to modern circumstances, Scalia emphatically rejects the idea that judges can properly "smuggle" in new rights or deny old rights by using the Due Process Clause, for instance. In fact, such judicial discretion might lead to the destruction of the Bill of Rights if a majority of the judges ever wished to reach that most undesirable of goals.

This essay is followed by four commentaries by Professors Gordon Wood, Laurence Tribe, Mary Ann Glendon, and Ronald Dworkin, who engage Justice Scalia's ideas about judicial interpretation from varying standpoints. In the spirit of debate, Justice Scalia responds to these critics.

Also in this Series
More Like This
More Details
Contributors:
ISBN:
9780691026305
Reviews from GoodReads
Loading GoodReads Reviews.
Tagging
Tags:
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Staff View

Grouping Information

Grouped Work ID b2dbc0e6-fbd2-1f5d-8c5b-77b0efc3dba3
Full title matter of interpretation federal courts and the law an essay
Author scalia antonin
Grouping Category book
Last Update 2017-12-19 00:08:34AM
Last Indexed 2018-05-26 01:18:24AM

Solr Details

accelerated_reader_interest_level
accelerated_reader_point_value 0
accelerated_reader_reading_level 0
auth_author2 Gutmann, Amy.
author Scalia, Antonin.
author2-role Gutmann, Amy.
author_display Scalia, Antonin
available_at_school MLK Jr. Magnet
collection_school Non-Fiction
detailed_location_school MLK Jr. Magnet - Teen Non-Fiction
display_description
format_category_school Books
format_school Book
id b2dbc0e6-fbd2-1f5d-8c5b-77b0efc3dba3
isbn 9780691026305
item_details ils:CARL0000527198|B00007480|MLK Jr. Magnet - Teen Non-Fiction|347.7326 SCA|||1|false|false|||||On Shelf||6C497||
itype_school Book
last_indexed 2018-05-26T06:18:24.212Z
lexile_score -1
literary_form Non Fiction
literary_form_full Non Fiction
local_callnumber_school 347.7326 SCA
owning_library_school Schools
owning_location_school MLK Jr. Magnet
primary_isbn 9780691026305
publishDate 1997
record_details ils:CARL0000527198|Book|Books||English|Princeton University Press,|c1997.|xiii, 159 p. ; 25 cm.
recordtype grouped_work
scoping_details_school ils:CARL0000527198|B00007480|On Shelf|On Shelf|false|true|true|false|false|true||||
subject_facet Constitutional law -- United States, Judge-made law -- United States, Law -- United States -- Interpretation and construction
title_display A matter of interpretation : federal courts and the law : an essay
title_full A matter of interpretation : federal courts and the law : an essay / by Antonin Scalia ; with commentary by Amy Gutmann, editor ... [et al.]
title_short A matter of interpretation :
title_sub federal courts and the law : an essay
topic_facet Constitutional law, Interpretation and construction, Judge-made law, Law